ยง

Northwest Drayage Co.

201 N.L.R.B. 749 (N.L.R.B. 1973)
Northwest Drayage Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Atlas Engine Works v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    395 U.S. 828 (1969)   Cited 31 times

    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 598. Decided June 23, 1969. Together with No. 906, Thrift Drug Co. of Pennsylvania v. National Labor Relations Board, and No. 1213, Lou De Young's Market Basket, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, also on petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit; and No. 1273, National Labor Relations Board v. Pembek Oil Corp., on petition for writ of certiorari

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of ยง 8(a)(1).

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thor Power Tool Co.

    351 F.2d 584 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 68 times
    Concluding that "when the entire record is considered there was substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that [employee's] discharge was the result of his having presented a grievance to the management" even though employee was overheard referring to company's superintendent as "the horse's ass" and was thereafter summarily discharged

  4. N.L.R.B. v. City Yellow Cab Company

    344 F.2d 575 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 26 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that at times where no representatives of management were present, switch-board operators were not supervisors in part because company officers were at all times reachable by phone

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Pembeck Oil Corp.

    404 F.2d 105 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 16 times
    In Pembeck, decided after Better Val-U Stores, Judge Hays again dissented, pointing out that neither Flomatic nor Val-U Stores had reached to ยง 8(a)(5) cases and urging that the "flagrant violation" standard not be extended to such cases.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Company

    293 F.2d 300 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 23 times
    In Atlanta Coca-Cola, for example, the court was concerned with the General Counsel's failure to produce evidence of discriminatory intent as to each of the individual employees, rather than with the placement of the burden of persuasion. See, e. g., 293 F.2d at 309 ("This is not a case where conflicting inferences of equal weight may be drawn from the record.")

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Zimnox Coal Company

    336 F.2d 516 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 10 times

    No. 15335. September 14, 1964. Leo N. McGuire, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Henry M. Wick, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., and Dominic J. Bianco, Steubenville, Ohio (Coleman Bianco, Steubenville, Ohio, Richard J. Smith, Delisi, Wick Vuono, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief; Jack B. Josselson, Schmidt, Effron, Josselson

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Missouri Transit

    250 F.2d 261 (8th Cir. 1957)   Cited 15 times

    No. 15796. December 27, 1957. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Duane B. Beeson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Glenn L. Moller, St. Louis, Mo. (Moller Talent, St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for respondents. Before SANBORN, WOODROUGH and JOHNSEN, Circuit Judges. SANBORN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dant

    207 F.2d 165 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 9 times

    No. 12985. September 15, 1953. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Asst. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Norton J. Come, Morris A. Solomon, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Raymond S. Smathurst, Washington, D.C., J.P. Stirling, Roscoe Watts, John T. Casey, Portland, Or., for appellee. Before HEALY, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the Board, requests enforcement

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys