§

Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

366 NLRB No. 147 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

13 Cited authorities

  1. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.

    500 U.S. 20 (1991)   Cited 3,070 times   59 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1994 ed.), may be subject to compulsory arbitration

  2. EPIC Sys. Corp. v. Lewis

    138 S. Ct. 1612 (2018)   Cited 964 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under Concepcion , "courts may not allow a contract defense to reshape traditional individualized arbitration" and "a rule seeking to declare individualized arbitration proceedings off limits" is preempted by the FAA

  3. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  4. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  5. Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP

    834 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016)   Cited 147 times   52 Legal Analyses
    Holding arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims violate the NLRA and fall within the FAA's saving clause

  6. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 141 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced

  7. Lewis v. Epic Sys. Corp.

    823 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2016)   Cited 124 times   58 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such waivers violate the Fair Labor Standards Act

  8. Murphy Oil United States, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015)   Cited 66 times   103 Legal Analyses
    Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA

  9. Brady v. Nat'l. Football League

    644 F.3d 661 (8th Cir. 2011)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that "a lawsuit filed in good faith by a group of employees to achieve more favorable terms or conditions of employment is 'concerted activity' under 29 U.S.C. § 157"

  10. Salt River Val. W. Users' v. N.L.R.B

    206 F.2d 325 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 24 times

    No. 13456. July 23, 1953. Jennings, Strouss, Salmon Trask, Irving A. Jennings, Richard G. Kleindienst, Phoenix, Ariz., for petitioner. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Dominick L. Manoli, Thomas F. Maher, Attys., NLRB, Washington, D.C., Charles Hackler, Atty., NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before MATHEWS, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. The Salt River Valley Water Users' Association

  11. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 36,048 times   1252 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"

  12. Section 226.7 - [Effective until 1/1/2027] Work during meal, rest, or recovery period

    Cal. Lab. Code § 226.7   Cited 293 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Stating that employers are required to "provide an employee a meal or rest or recovery period in accordance with a state law"