§

Northern States Steel Builders, Inc., Afl-Cio, Local 111

298 N.L.R.B. 930 (N.L.R.B. 1990)
Northern States Steel Builders, Inc., Afl-Cio, Local 111

21 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  3. Bowen v. United States Postal Service

    459 U.S. 212 (1983)   Cited 229 times
    Affirming the district court's action of granting a new trial “because the jury was improperly instructed on the question of liability and reached their decision under an incomplete theory of law”

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.

    396 U.S. 258 (1969)   Cited 184 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."

  5. Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

    319 U.S. 533 (1943)   Cited 326 times
    Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

  6. Pattern Makers' League v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    473 U.S. 95 (1985)   Cited 76 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding the NLRB's interpretation of the Act

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 282, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

    740 F.2d 141 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 75 times
    Holding that there is "no reason why a breach of this duty cannot also be found . . . [where] the Union is charged with failing to inform many of its members about an arbitration award affecting their employment status

  8. Woodline Motor Freight, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    843 F.2d 285 (8th Cir. 1988)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that the restoration order was not unduly burdensome where it "would not require capital investment disproportionate to [the employer's] resources or impose substantial, continuing losses"

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 433

    600 F.2d 770 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that "[t]he Board may properly find an unfair labor practice when the issue has been fully litigated even though not specifically pleaded in the complaint"

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Union Nacional de Trabajadores

    540 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1976)   Cited 27 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 75-1372, 75-1374 to 75-1376. Argued February 10, 1976. Decided June 21, 1976. Robert A. Giannasi, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel and Andrew F. Tranovich, Washington, D.C., were on brief for petitioner. Paul Schachter, Hato Rey, P.R., with whom David Scribner, Elizabeth Schneider, New York City, Luis M. Escribano, Hato Rey, P.R., Ralph Shapiro, New York City, and Ismael Delgado Gonzalez, San Juan

  11. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,061 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB