§

Northeastern Indiana Bldg. & Const. Trades, Etc.

148 N.L.R.B. 854 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Northeastern Indiana Bldg. & Const. Trades, Etc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Hughes v. Superior Court

    339 U.S. 460 (1950)   Cited 285 times
    In Hughes v. Superior Court, 339 U.S. 460, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not bar use of the injunction to prohibit picketing of a place of business solely to secure compliance with a demand that its employees be hired in percentage to the racial origin of its customers.

  3. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  4. Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board

    357 U.S. 93 (1958)   Cited 201 times
    Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act

  5. Orange Belt Dist. Coun. of Ptrs. v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 534 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 56 times

    No. 17388. Argued November 6, 1963. Decided January 30, 1964. Mr. Herbert M. Ansell, Washington, D.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioners. Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for petitioners. Mr. David Barr, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioners. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board

  6. Essex Cty. Dist. Coun. Carpenters v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 636 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 23 times

    No. 14436. Argued November 8, 1963. Decided April 30, 1964. Robert D. Corbin, Newark, N.J. (Joseph P. Dunn, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for petitioner. Melvin J. Welles, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Janet Kohn, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Louis Sherman, Laurence J. Cohen, Washington, D.C. (Sherman, Dunn Sickles, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for Building

  7. Construction, Prod. Lab. U. v. N.L.R.B

    323 F.2d 422 (9th Cir. 1963)   Cited 21 times
    Noting that the Supreme Court recognizes a "definite" distinction between an agreement to cease doing business and the cessation itself

  8. Building Constr. Trades Coun. v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 540 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 17 times
    In Building ConstructionTrades Council, supra, the same panel as in Orange Belt I made explicit that union signatory clauses — those requiring general contractors to use subcontractors who are "signatory to the agreements of the various construction local unions" — by their terms have a secondary focus, and that attempts to secure their enforcement by strikes come within the proscription of section 8(b)(4)(ii)(B). That is precisely the situation we have here.

  9. Semler v. United States

    332 F.2d 6 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 6 times

    No. 18705. March 16, 1964. Rogan Radding, and David M. Richman, Burbank, Cal., for appellant. Charles A. Muecke, U.S. Atty., John E. Lindberg, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Jo Ann Diamos, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for appellee. Before BARNES, MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge. Appellant stands convicted of conspiracy to steal and receive Government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and, in three counts, of having received Government property knowing it to be stolen

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 47, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

    234 F.2d 296 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 4 times

    No. 15874. June 5, 1956. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Allen P. Schoolfield, Jr., Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Owsley Vose, John Francis Lawless, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Mullinax Wells, Dallas, Tex., for respondents. Before TUTTLE, CAMERON and JONES, Circuit Judges. CAMERON, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for