§

North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services

351 N.L.R.B. 464 (N.L.R.B. 2007)
North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services

9 Cited authorities

  1. Bounds v. Smith

    430 U.S. 817 (1977)   Cited 8,378 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that states must provide prisoners with adequate law libraries or adequate assistance from persons trained in the law

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 651 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Avecor, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    931 F.2d 924 (D.C. Cir. 1991)   Cited 68 times
    Noting that inferences drawn from expertise may "reduce the weight of evidence necessary to impute knowledge ... but ... do not wholly eliminate the need for evidence"

  5. Ceridian Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    435 F.3d 352 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 04-1421. Argued October 31, 2005. Decided January 27, 2006. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Donald W. Selzer, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Joseph P. Harkins. Jeff Barham, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Fred

  6. Detroit Newspaper Agency v. N.L.R.B

    435 F.3d 302 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reversing Board finding of Wright Line prima facie case for lack of substantial evidence

  7. Hugh H. Wilson Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 1345 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 37 times
    Finding concerted activity because "[i]n substance, the employees had a gripe. They assembled. They presented their grievance to management. . . ."

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hicks Oils & Hicksgas, Inc.

    942 F.2d 1140 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 3 times

    No. 89-2795. Argued January 14, 1991. Decided September 4, 1991. Barbara A. Atkin, Judith P. Flower, N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, William A. Baudler (argued), N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., Joseph H. Solien, N.L.R.B., Region 14, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. Gary A. Wincek (argued), William L. Becker, Laner, Muchin, Dombrow, Becker, Levin Tominberg, Chicago, Ill., Nancy M. Watkins, Wilburn, Suggs Watkins, St. Louis, Mo., for respondent

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second