North Carolina License Plate Agency

19 Cited authorities

  1. Jaffee v. Redmond

    518 U.S. 1 (1996)   Cited 1,188 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "confidential communications between a licensed psychotherapist and her patients in the course of diagnosis or treatment are protected from compelled disclosure under Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence"
  2. Branzburg v. Hayes

    408 U.S. 665 (1972)   Cited 1,825 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that government need not “demonstrate some ‘compelling need’ for a newsman's testimony”
  3. Trammel v. United States

    445 U.S. 40 (1980)   Cited 1,198 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because "[t]estimonial exclusionary rules and privileges contravene the fundamental principle that 'the public . . . has a right to every man's evidence,' . . . they must be strictly construed"
  4. University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

    493 U.S. 182 (1990)   Cited 643 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff university failed to make out a cognizable First Amendment claim in light of speculative, attenuated, and remote harm
  5. United States v. Gillock

    445 U.S. 360 (1980)   Cited 231 times
    Holding that a federal criminal prosecution was important enough to overcome a state lawmaker's assertion of legislative privilege
  6. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  8. Perrignon v. Bergen Brunswig Corporation

    77 F.R.D. 455 (N.D. Cal. 1978)   Cited 86 times
    Holding that party waived attorney-client privilege through disclosure of privileged conversations at depositions
  9. Tradesmen Intern., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    275 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 21 times
    Assuming union organizer's activity constituted "concerted activity" under 29 U.S.C. § 157 but holding it was not protected under statute
  10. United States v. Chiarella

    588 F.2d 1358 (2d Cir. 1978)   Cited 51 times
    In United States v. Chiarella, 588 F.2d 1358, 1372 (2nd Cir. 1978), rev'd on other grounds, 445 U.S. 222, 100 S.Ct. 1108, 63 L.Ed.2d 348 (1980), the Second Circuit declined to recognize a New York statute that prohibited the use of unemployment compensation records in any court proceeding, unless the state labor commissioner was a party to the action.
  11. Rule 501 - Privilege in General

    Fed. R. Evid. 501   Cited 4,233 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "in a civil case, state law governs privilege regarding a claim or defense for which state law supplies the rule of decision"
  12. Section 421.11 - Unemployment agency; cooperation with federal agency; reports; compliance with federal regulations; "social security act" defined; disclosure of information; reciprocal agreements

    Mich. Comp. Laws § 421.11   Cited 35 times

    (a) In the administration of this act, the unemployment agency shall cooperate with the appropriate agency of the United States under the social security act. The unemployment agency shall make reports, in a form and containing information as the appropriate agency of the United States may require, and shall comply with the provisions that the appropriate agency of the United States prescribes to assure the correctness and verification of the reports. The unemployment agency, subject to this act

  13. Section 96-4 - Administration; powers and duties of the Assistant Secretary; Board of Review

    N.C. Gen. Stat. § 96-4   Cited 28 times
    Stating that all "letters, reports, communication, or any other matters . . . from the employer . . . to the Commission . . . shall be absolutely privileged communication in any civil or criminal proceedings. . . ."