§

North Arkansas Electric Cooperative, Inc.

168 N.L.R.B. 921 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
North Arkansas Electric Cooperative, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Packard Co. v. Labor Board

    330 U.S. 485 (1947)   Cited 382 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board determinations of unit issues involves a "large measure of informed discretion."

  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

  3. Labor Board v. Lion Oil Co.

    352 U.S. 282 (1957)   Cited 139 times
    Observing that the court bears "a judicial responsibility to find that interpretation which can most fairly be said to be embedded in the statute, in the sense of being most harmonious with its scheme and with the general purposes that Congress manifested"

  4. Retail Clerks International Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    366 F.2d 642 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 21 times
    In Retail Clerks International Assn. v. NLRB, supra, MR. CHIEF JUSTICE (then Circuit Judge) BURGER explained the Board's policy on "managerial employees": "The Board also excludes from the protections of the Act, as managerial employees, 'those who formulate, determine, and effectuate an employer's policies,' AFL-CIO, [120 N.L.R.B. 969, 973 (1958)], and those who have discretion in the performance of their jobs, but not if the discretion must conform to an employer's established policy, Eastern Camera and Photo Corp., 140 N.L.R.B. 569, 571 (1963) (store managers who could set prices are not managerial).

  5. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    339 F.2d 116 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 22 times
    In International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. NLRB, supra, MR. JUSTICE (then Circuit Judge) MARSHALL explained that "[a]lthough the Act makes no special provision for 'managerial employees,' under a Board policy of long duration, this category of personnel has been excluded from the protection of the Act."

  6. Henry I. Siegel Co. v. N.L.R.B

    340 F.2d 309 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 6 times

    No. 221, Docket 29058. Argued December 4, 1964. Decided January 13, 1965. Osmond K. Fraenkel, New York City, (Hays, St. John, Abramson Heilbron, New York City, William Abramson, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner. Hans J. Lehmann, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty. N.L.R.B.), for respondent. Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, (James J. Graham, New York City, of counsel)

  7. Local Un. 219, Retail Clerks Int. v. N.L.R.B

    265 F.2d 814 (D.C. Cir. 1959)   Cited 10 times

    No. 14481. Argued December 15, 1958. Decided March 19, 1959. Mr. S.G. Lippman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Mr. Joseph E. Finley, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Mr. Owsley Vose, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board

  8. Local Union No. 12 v. National Labor Rel. Board

    189 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 17 times

    No. 10310. May 23, 1951. Rehearing Denied June 11, 1951. G. William Horsley, R.W. Deffenbaugh, Springfield, Ill., for petitioner. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Norton J. Come, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, and Alice Andrews, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before KERNER, FINNEGAN, and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. KERNER, Circuit Judge. This is a petition

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Knoxville Pub. Co.

    124 F.2d 875 (6th Cir. 1942)   Cited 16 times

    No. 8658. January 16, 1942. On Petition of National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board to adjudge the Knoxville Publishing Company and its officers and agents in contempt for failure to comply with consent decree for the enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board requiring the Knoxville Publishing Company to cease and desist from discouraging membership of its employees in the Knoxville Newspaper Guild and to bargain collectively