North American Manufacturing Co.

14 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Brooks v. Labor Board
348 U.S. 96 (1954) Cited 300 times
Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board
Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board
321 U.S. 702 (1944) Cited 252 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
N.L.R.B. v. Gulfmont Hotel Company
362 F.2d 588 (5th Cir. 1966) Cited 43 times
No. 22340. June 24, 1966. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Theodore J. Martineau, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. H.L. Deakins, Jr., Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellee. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and CHOATE, District Judge. TUTTLE, Chief Judge: This petition by the
N.L.R.B. v. Little Rock Downtowner, Inc.
414 F.2d 1084 (8th Cir. 1969) Cited 37 times
No. 19427. August 19, 1969. Herman M. Levy, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Jonathan M. Marks, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Richard A. Brackhahn, of Fowler, Brackhahn Young, Memphis, Tenn., for respondent, Newell N. Fowler, Memphis, Tenn., on the brief. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, Chief Judge, and VOGEL and HEANEY, Circuit Judges
National Cash Register Company v. N.L.R.B
494 F.2d 189 (8th Cir. 1974) Cited 28 times
No. 73-1188. Submitted December 10, 1973. Decided March 13, 1974. D. J. Sullivan, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before GIBSON, and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and TALBOT SMITH, Senior District Judge. The Honorable TALBOT SMITH Senior District Judge, Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. ROSS, Circuit Judge. National Cash Register Company (NCR) filed a Petition
Orion Corporation v. N.L.R.B
515 F.2d 81 (7th Cir. 1975) Cited 22 times
No. 74-1432. Argued January 15, 1975. Decided April 28, 1975. Walter S. Davis, Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John D. Burgoyne and Roger T. Brice, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CLARK, Associate Justice. and CUMMINGS and TONE, Circuit Judges. Associate Justice Tom C. Clark of the Supreme Court of the United States (Retired) is sitting by designation. PER CURIAM
N.L.R.B. v. Washington Manor, Inc.
519 F.2d 750 (6th Cir. 1975) Cited 15 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Washington Manor, Inc., 519 F.2d 750, 753 (6th Cir. 1975), this court stated that "[a] high turnover of employees unaccompanied by objective evidence that new employees do not support the union is no evidence of loss of majority status by the union."
Wirtz v. B.A.C. Steel Products, Inc.
312 F.2d 14 (4th Cir. 1962) Cited 29 times
In B.A.C., the Secretary supplied the exact information here requested by defendant, and if plaintiff will just do what Secretary Wirtz did voluntarily in B.A.C., defendant will have the information it wants.
N.L.R.B. v. Leatherwood Drilling Company
513 F.2d 270 (5th Cir. 1975) Cited 14 times
Nos. 74-2415, 74-2421. May 27, 1975. Rehearing Denied July 24, 1975. Elliot Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Bert Bisgyer, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., W. Edwin Youngblood, Director, Region 16, N.L.R.B., Ft. Worth, Tex., for petitioner. Brooks L. Harman, Odessa, Tex., for respondents. Application for enforcement of orders of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas case). Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and MURRAH and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. Of the Tenth Circuit sitting by designation. MURRAH, Circuit
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

North American Manufacturing Co.

14 Cited authorities

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

In N.L.R.B. v. Washington Manor, Inc., 519 F.2d 750, 753 (6th Cir. 1975), this court stated that "[a] high turnover of employees unaccompanied by objective evidence that new employees do not support the union is no evidence of loss of majority status by the union."

In B.A.C., the Secretary supplied the exact information here requested by defendant, and if plaintiff will just do what Secretary Wirtz did voluntarily in B.A.C., defendant will have the information it wants.

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"