North Adams Inn Corp.

Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
N.L.R.B. v. Colonial Lincoln Mercury Sales
485 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1973) Cited 1 times
No. 73-1117. October 16, 1973. Elliott Moore, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Walter C. Phillips, Director, Region 10, Atlanta, Ga., Jane P. Schlaifer, Washington, D.C. (N.L.R.B.), for petitioner. John Bacheller, Jr., J. B. Rhoads, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before GEWIN, AINSWORTH and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This case is before the court on the application of the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to § 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act for the enforcement