Norlee Togs, Inc.
2 Cited authorities
Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board
185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950) Cited 162 times 2 Legal AnalysesIn Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
National Labor Rel. Bd. v. Pyne Molding Corp
226 F.2d 818 (2d Cir. 1955) Cited 25 timesNo. 84, Docket 23635. Argued October 5, 1955. Decided October 28, 1955. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Provost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Arnold Ordman and James A. Ryan, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Morgan P. Ames, Stamford, Conn., for respondent. W.H.F. Millar, Waynesville, N.C., of counsel. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. This petition to enforce