3 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Pittsburgh S.S. Co.
337 U.S. 656 (1949) Cited 88 timesHolding "total rejection of an opposed view cannot of itself impugn the integrity or competence of a trier of fact"
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
354 F.2d 707 (5th Cir. 1966) Cited 17 timesNo. 22180. January 10, 1966. H.L. Deakins, Jr., Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul M. Thompson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, COLEMAN, Circuit Judge, and HUNTER, District Judge. HUNTER, District Judge. The Great Atlantic and Pacific
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.
120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941) Cited 15 timesNo. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys