§

Nopco Chemical Co.

138 N.L.R.B. 1275 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
Nopco Chemical Co.

5 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Solo Cup Company

    237 F.2d 521 (8th Cir. 1956)   Cited 40 times

    No. 15524. October 18, 1956. Rehearing Denied November 16, 1956. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for petitioner. John J. Hasburgh, Kansas City, Mo. (Carl E. Enggas and Watson S. Marshall Enggas, Kansas City, Mo., were with him on the brief), for respondent. Before WOODROUGH

  2. Time-O-Matic, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    264 F.2d 96 (7th Cir. 1959)   Cited 32 times

    No. 12424. March 5, 1959. Edward B. Miller, Merrill Shepard, Willis S. Ryza, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner, Time-O-Matic, Inc. Pope Ballard, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fred S. Landess, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge and HASTINGS and PARKINSON, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. Petitioner

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Laister-Kauffmann A.

    144 F.2d 9 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 15 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Laister-Kauffmann Aircraft Corp., 8 Cir., 144 F.2d 9, and Allen-Morrison Sign Co., 79 N.L.R.B. 904, some indicia of actual supervisory authority were present as well as elements of estoppel.

  4. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Cleveland-Cliffs I

    133 F.2d 295 (6th Cir. 1943)   Cited 14 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co., 6 Cir., 133 F.2d 295, 300, this court said: "It has long been the rule that mere discontinuance of an unlawful practice will not relieve the court (or an administrative agency) of the duty to pass upon a pending charge of illegality, when by the mere volition of the parties the illegal practice may be resumed.

  5. Solvay Process Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    117 F.2d 83 (5th Cir. 1941)   Cited 14 times

    No. 9519. January 4, 1941. Rehearing Denied March 8, 1941. Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Solvay Process Company for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board sitting at Washington, D.C. The Board prayed that the order be enforced. Petition dismissed; enforcement decree granted. C.V. Porter, of Baton Rouge, La., and T. Justin Moore and Edmund M. Preston, both of Richmond, Va., for petitioner. Victor A. Sachse, of Baton Rouge,