§

Noah's Bay Area Bagels, Inc.

331 N.L.R.B. 188 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
Noah's Bay Area Bagels, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Phil Smidt Son, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    810 F.2d 638 (7th Cir. 1987)   Cited 51 times
    In Phil Smidt Son, Inc. v. NLRB, 810 F.2d 638, 639 n. 1 (7th Cir. 1987), and K I Transfer Storage, Inc. v. NLRB, 805 F.2d 749, 752 n. 5 (7th Cir. 1986), we applied the 1985 EAJA to determine the proper scope of the inquiry regarding the "position of the United States."

  3. Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Nat. Lbr. Relations Bd.

    144 F.3d 830 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times
    Deferring to agency's resolution of contradictory evidence

  4. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    884 F.2d 34 (1st Cir. 1989)   Cited 35 times
    Holding that agencies need not "microscopically examin[e] prior cases" and that prior cases are not "straitjacket, inhibiting experimentation or change"

  5. TRW-United Greenfield Division v. N.L.R.B

    637 F.2d 410 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 38 times
    Discussing what threatened employees could reasonably conclude as the litmus test for a Section 8 violation

  6. Somerset Welding Steel, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    987 F.2d 777 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 11 times
    Finding no adequate justification for Gissel order because "the Board did not adequately consider changes in management and employee turnover at the Company since the time of the election"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Otis Hospital

    545 F.2d 252 (1st Cir. 1976)   Cited 25 times
    Withholding promised wage increase from all employees during union organizing campaign violated § 8

  8. Exxon Research Engineering Co. v. N.L.R.B

    89 F.3d 228 (5th Cir. 1996)   Cited 1 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 95-60358. July 16, 1996. Stephen W. Smith, Fulbright Jaworski, Houston, TX, for respondents. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Peter David Winkler, Julie Brock Broido, National labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, Michael Dunn, Director, National Labor Relations Board, Fort Worth, TX, for NLRB. Howard Shapiro, McCalla, Thompson, Pyburn, Hymowitz Shapiro, New Orleans, LA, for The Thrift Plan of Exxon Corporation, A Part of the Benefit Plan of Exxon Corporation and participating

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Sav-On Drugs, Inc.

    728 F.2d 1254 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 6 times
    Concluding that the employer could not reasonably rely on a regional director’s determination because it could be reversed on appeal

  10. Belcher Towing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    726 F.2d 705 (11th Cir. 1984)   Cited 6 times

    No. 82-6163. March 9, 1984. Ford Harrison, G. Paris Sykes, Jr., John P. Campbell, Atlanta, Ga., Mary K. Higginbotham, Houston, Tex., for petitioner, cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Joseph Frankl, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Joel C. Glanstein, O'Donnell Schwartz, New York City, for District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Assn. Petitions for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before ANDERSON and