§

Nita H., Petitioner, v. Sally Jewell, Secretary, Department of the Interior (National Park Service), Agency.

0320110050 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 16, 2014)
Nita H., Petitioner, v. Sally Jewell, Secretary, Department of the Interior (National Park Service), Agency.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Univ. of Tex. Sw. Med. Ctr. v. Nassar

    570 U.S. 338 (2013)   Cited 5,452 times   78 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must establish but-for causation in a Title VII retaliation claim

  2. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.

    557 U.S. 167 (2009)   Cited 4,628 times   83 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must establish but-for causation in an ADEA disparate treatment claim

  3. Burlington Indus., Inc. v. Ellerth

    524 U.S. 742 (1998)   Cited 7,252 times   93 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer is not liable for a hostile work environment created by one of its employees when "the employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any sexually harassing behavior, and . . . the plaintiff employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the employer or to avoid harm otherwise"

  4. Coleman v. Donahoe

    667 F.3d 835 (7th Cir. 2012)   Cited 1,225 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that higher-level decisionmaker was a common supervisor for similarly situated employees

  5. Gomez-Perez v. Potter

    553 U.S. 474 (2008)   Cited 308 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the statutory phrase 'discrimination based on age' " in § 633a "includes retaliation based on the filing of an age discrimination complaint"

  6. Troupe v. May Dept. Stores Co.

    20 F.3d 734 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 1,003 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff may prove discrimination through evidence of "ambiguous statements, suspicious timing, discrimination against other employees, and other pieces of evidence none conclusive in itself but together composing a convincing mosaic of discrimination"

  7. Rivera v. City and County of Denver

    365 F.3d 912 (10th Cir. 2004)   Cited 449 times
    Holding the relevant pretext inquiry is whether the employer honestly believes it proffered reasons and acted in good faith on those beliefs

  8. Conroy v. Vilsack

    707 F.3d 1163 (10th Cir. 2013)   Cited 278 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that although a clear line of demarcation has never been established, “[i]t appears clear that, if the adverse action occurs in a brief period up to one and a half months after the protected activity, temporal proximity alone will be sufficient to establish the requisite causal inference.”

  9. Shager v. Upjohn Co.

    913 F.2d 398 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a supervisor's age-based prejudice tainted a committee's decision to fire the plaintiff because the supervisor's portrayal of the plaintiff to the committee in the worst possible light "may well have been decisive" in light of the fact that the committee's deliberations were "brief, perhaps perfunctory" and none of the committee members could remember having considered the issue of the plaintiffs termination

  10. Llampallas v. Mini-Circuits, Lab., Inc.

    163 F.3d 1236 (11th Cir. 1998)   Cited 365 times
    Holding that an individual who received no compensation as an officer-director could not be considered an "employee" under Title VII