Nina J. Jodell, Rita A.Miles, Marie B. Lea, Gloria J.Bowman, Imogene D.Harold, Carolyn T.Barney, Betty J. Brown, Kathy T. Morgan, Mary R. Hazel, Mary M Corbin Complainants, v. Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

7 Cited authorities

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
411 U.S. 792 (1973) Cited 53,667 times 99 Legal Analyses
Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision
St. Mary's Honor Ctr. v. Hicks
509 U.S. 502 (1993) Cited 12,459 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a trier of fact may infer discrimination upon rejecting an employer's proffered reason for termination
Tex. Dept. of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine
450 U.S. 248 (1981) Cited 20,322 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding in the Title VII context that the plaintiff's prima facie case creates "a legally mandatory, rebuttable presumption" that shifts the burden of proof to the employer, and "if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff"
U.S. Postal Service Bd. of Govs. v. Aikens
460 U.S. 711 (1983) Cited 2,428 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that because "[t]here will seldom be `eyewitness' testimony to the employer's mental process," evidence of the employer's discriminatory attitude in general is relevant and admissible to prove discrimination
Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters
438 U.S. 567 (1978) Cited 2,188 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a district court was "entitled to consider the racial mix of the work force when trying to make the determination as to motivation" in the employment discrimination context
Hudson v. International Business Machines Corp.
620 F.2d 351 (2d Cir. 1980) Cited 113 times
Holding that the McDonnellDouglas criteria should apply to Section 1981 claims
Talley v. United States Postal Service
720 F.2d 505 (8th Cir. 1983) Cited 57 times
Finding that plaintiff, who was a temporary casual employee, was not similarly situated to other employees, career employees who were subject to a different disciplinary system

Nina J. Jodell, Rita A.Miles, Marie B. Lea, Gloria J.Bowman, Imogene D.Harold, Carolyn T.Barney, Betty J. Brown, Kathy T. Morgan, Mary R. Hazel, Mary M Corbin Complainants, v. Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

7 Cited authorities

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision

St. Mary's Honor Ctr. v. Hicks

Holding that a trier of fact may infer discrimination upon rejecting an employer's proffered reason for termination

Tex. Dept. of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine

Holding in the Title VII context that the plaintiff's prima facie case creates "a legally mandatory, rebuttable presumption" that shifts the burden of proof to the employer, and "if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff"

U.S. Postal Service Bd. of Govs. v. Aikens

Holding that because "[t]here will seldom be `eyewitness' testimony to the employer's mental process," evidence of the employer's discriminatory attitude in general is relevant and admissible to prove discrimination

Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters

Holding that a district court was "entitled to consider the racial mix of the work force when trying to make the determination as to motivation" in the employment discrimination context

Hudson v. International Business Machines Corp.

Holding that the McDonnellDouglas criteria should apply to Section 1981 claims

Talley v. United States Postal Service

Finding that plaintiff, who was a temporary casual employee, was not similarly situated to other employees, career employees who were subject to a different disciplinary system