§

Niles-Bement-Pond Co.

97 N.L.R.B. 165 (N.L.R.B. 1951)
Niles-Bement-Pond Co.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    170 F.2d 247 (7th Cir. 1949)   Cited 156 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Accepting the Board's conclusion "that the term `wages' . . . must be construed to include emoluments of value, like pension and insurance benefits, which may accrue to employees out of their employment relationship"

  2. Walling v. Richmond Screw Anchor Co.

    154 F.2d 780 (2d Cir. 1946)   Cited 68 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that payments that were regularly and actually made and facilitated by the employer could qualify as remuneration for employment

  3. W.W. Cross Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    174 F.2d 875 (1st Cir. 1949)   Cited 52 times
    Holding that " 'wages' " in the NLRA "embraces within its meaning direct and immediate economic benefits flowing from the employment relationship covers a group insurance program"

  4. Singer Mfg. Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    119 F.2d 131 (7th Cir. 1941)   Cited 37 times
    In Singer Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 119 F.2d 131, 134, the court said: "* * * The greatest of rascals may solemnly affirm his honesty of purpose; that does not foreclose a jury from finding from the evidence submitted that he possesses no trace of such innocent quality.

  5. Walling v. Wall Wire Products Co.

    161 F.2d 470 (6th Cir. 1947)   Cited 21 times
    Explaining that parties cannot avoid the purposes of the FLSA by designating a fictitious regular rate

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tower Hosiery Mills

    180 F.2d 701 (4th Cir. 1950)   Cited 13 times

    No. 6015. Argued January 11, 1950. Decided March 6, 1950. William Feldesman, Assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Samuel M. Singer, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. L.P. McLendon and Thornton H. Brooks, Greensboro, N.C. (Thomas D. Cooper, Burlington, N.C., on brief), for respondent. Before

  7. Walling v. Garlock Packing Co.

    159 F.2d 44 (2d Cir. 1947)   Cited 15 times
    In Walling v. Garlock Packing Co., supra [159 F.2d 46], a wage premium plan was adopted pursuant to which employees were thereafter to receive regular wage premiums or bonuses. It was stipulated in that case that the employees accepted and looked forward to receiving the bonus though they knew the company could withdraw the plan.

  8. Knapp v. Imperial Oil Gas Products Co.

    130 F.2d 1 (4th Cir. 1942)   Cited 14 times

    No. 4935. August 27, 1942. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston; George W. McClintic, Judge. Action by W.A. Knapp against Imperial Oil Gas Products Company for money due under verbal royalty contract. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded. Thomas J. Davis and Samuel A. Powell, both of Harrisville, W.Va., for appellant. J. Campbell Palmer, III, of Charleston, W. Va. (Koontz Koontz and W.W. Goldsmith

  9. McComb v. Shepard Niles Crane Hoist Corp.

    171 F.2d 69 (2d Cir. 1948)   Cited 3 times

    No. 52, Docket 21085. December 1, 1948. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of New York. Action by William R. McComb, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, against Shepard Niles Crane Hoist Corporation, to enjoin defendant from violating the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., and to enjoin shipment by defendant in interstate commerce of goods produced in violation of provisions

  10. Powell v. Republic Creosoting Co.

    172 Wn. 155 (Wash. 1933)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that a substantial bonus paid for 11 consecutive years is sufficient to hold that future bonus money was necessarily due as compensation

  11. Section 207 - Maximum hours

    29 U.S.C. § 207   Cited 10,785 times   231 Legal Analyses
    Establishing overtime rules

  12. Section 2152 - Special rules relating to section 2013 criteria employees

    50 U.S.C. § 2152

    (a) In general Except as otherwise provided in this section, in the application of chapter 84 of title 5 to an employee of the Agency who is subject to such chapter and is designated by the Director under the criteria prescribed in section 2013 of this title, such employee shall be treated for purposes of determining such employee's retirement benefits and obligations under such chapter as if the employee were a law enforcement officer (as defined in section 8401(17) of title 5). (b) Voluntary and

  13. Section 778.6 - Effect of Davis-Bacon Act

    29 C.F.R. § 778.6   Cited 1 times

    Section 1 of the Davis-Bacon Act (46 Stat. 1494, as amended; 40 U.S.C. 276a ) provides for the inclusion of certain fringe benefits in the prevailing wages that are predetermined by the Secretary of Labor, under that Act and related statutes, as minimum wages for laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and subcontractors performing construction activity on Federal and federally assisted projects. Laborers and mechanics performing work subject to such predetermined minimum wages may, if they