Nick Bovis

4 Cited authorities

  1. In re Etablissements Darty Et Fils

    759 F.2d 15 (Fed. Cir. 1985)   Cited 8 times
    In Darty et Fils, however, even though, the primary question was whether "Darty" was primarily merely a surname, the Board had correctly held that the Opposers’ "provides no support for their contention."
  2. Kimberly Clark Corp. v. Marzall

    94 F. Supp. 254 (D.D.C. 1950)   Cited 1 times

    Civ. Nos. 1897, 5175. December 8, 1950. Cushman, Darby Cushman, Washington, D.C., C. Willard Hayes, Max Louis, Washington, D.C., Cyril A. Soans, William E. Anderson, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for plaintiff. E.L. Reynolds, Sol., Washington, D.C., for defendant. KIRKLAND, District Judge. This case is a consolidation of two separate causes of action filed by the plaintiff, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, to authorize the Commissioner of Patents to register plaintiff's

  3. Section 1127 - Construction and definitions; intent of chapter

    15 U.S.C. § 1127   Cited 3,039 times   99 Legal Analyses
    Granting standing under § 1114 to the legal representative of the registrant of a trademark
  4. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,610 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"