§

Niblock Excavating, Inc.

337 N.L.R.B. 53 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Niblock Excavating, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.

    530 U.S. 133 (2000)   Cited 21,534 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "trier of fact can reasonably infer from the falsity of the explanation that the employer is dissembling to cover up a discriminatory purpose"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B

    70 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues

  4. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Copes-Vulcan, Inc.

    611 F.2d 440 (3d Cir. 1979)

    No. 78-2392. Argued September 4, 1979. Decided October 11, 1979. John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Marjorie S. Gofreed, Sandra K. Williams (argued), Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George F. Lynch (argued), Stephen D. Bolerjack, Squire, Sanders Dempsey, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent, Copes-Vulcan, Inc.; Terrence F. Srsen, Corporate Industrial Relations