§

Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. d/b/a KOIN-TV

19-CA-232897 (N.L.R.B. Jun. 3, 2020)
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. d/b/a KOIN-TV

9 Cited authorities

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 228 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  3. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Whitesell Corp.

    638 F.3d 883 (8th Cir. 2011)   Cited 12 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the denial of enforcement on the basis that the Board lacked a proper quorum did not deprive the Board of jurisdiction to consider the case anew

  7. Kiewit Power Constructors Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    652 F.3d 22 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that a worker telling a supervisor he had “better bring [his] boxing gloves” in a dispute over break time did not lose the Act's protection

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thor Power Tool Co.

    351 F.2d 584 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 68 times
    Concluding that "when the entire record is considered there was substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that [employee's] discharge was the result of his having presented a grievance to the management" even though employee was overheard referring to company's superintendent as "the horse's ass" and was thereafter summarily discharged

  9. American M. In. Co. v. Lorentzen

    932 F.2d 958 (3d Cir. 1991)   Cited 6 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bentz v. American Red Cross, 932 F.2d 958 (3d Cir. 1991), we summarily affirmed a jury verdict against the Red Cross.