§

Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc. d/b/a WETM-TV

363 NLRB No. 32 (N.L.R.B. 2015)
Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc. d/b/a WETM-TV

10 Cited authorities

  1. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 632 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 314 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  3. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 181 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Solutia, Inc.

    699 F.3d 50 (1st Cir. 2012)   Cited 15 times
    Stating that “ ‘jurisdictional’ clauses that define the assignment of work to union members ... address a mandatory subject of bargaining”

  5. Facet Enterprises, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    907 F.2d 963 (10th Cir. 1990)   Cited 30 times
    In Facet Enterprises, we reasoned "[t]he policies underlying [§ 160(e)], i.e., notice, efficiency and providing the Board with the first opportunity to consider a claim, would have been undermined had the Supreme Court allowed judicial review" in Woelke & Romero and Garment Workers' Union.

  6. Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 6 times
    Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning

  7. Hill-Rom Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    957 F.2d 454 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 89-3721, 90-1236. Argued November 2, 1990. Decided March 6, 1992. William R. Stewart, N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, Robert I. Tendrich (argued), N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C. William T. Little, James S. Robles, N.L.R.B., Region 25, Indianapolis, Ind., for N.L.R.B. Kenneth J. Yerkes, Robert K. Bellamy (argued), Barnes Thornburg, Indianapolis, Ind., for Hill-Rom Co., Inc. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Quinn Restaurant Corp.

    14 F.3d 811 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 4 times

    No. 1870, Docket 93-4078. Argued August 13, 1993. Decided January 31, 1994. Nancy J. Gottfried, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC (Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, Yvonne T. Dixon, Acting Deputy Gen. Counsel, Nicholas E. Karatinos, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick C. Havard, Supervising Atty., Marilyn O'Rourke, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, of counsel), for petitioner. Richard G. Kass, Mineola, N Y (Rains Pogrebin, Mineola, NY, of counsel), for respondent

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Bay Shipbuilding Corp.

    721 F.2d 187 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 7 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Enforcing 263 N.L.R.B. 1133

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second