§

Newspaper & Periodical Drivers, Local 921

194 N.L.R.B. 37 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
Newspaper & Periodical Drivers, Local 921

10 Cited authorities

  1. Albrecht v. Herald Co.

    390 U.S. 145 (1968)   Cited 348 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding publisher's establishment of maximum resale price of newspapers sold by carriers per se violation of § 1

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Insurance Co. of America

    390 U.S. 254 (1968)   Cited 327 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "all of the incidents of the relationship must be assessed and weighed with no one factor being decisive"

  3. United States v. Silk

    331 U.S. 704 (1947)   Cited 542 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that truck drivers who owned their own trucks and hired their own helpers were "small businessmen" who were properly classified as independent contractors

  4. Carnation Company v. N.L.R.B

    429 F.2d 1130 (9th Cir. 1970)   Cited 24 times
    Finding that the fact distributors did not have to wear uniforms was indicative of independent contractor status

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Lindsay Newspapers, Inc.

    315 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 25 times
    In NLRB v. Lindsay Newspapers, Inc., 315 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1963), the court listed seventeen factors which supported the Board's conclusion of employee status.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. A.S. Abell Company

    327 F.2d 1 (4th Cir. 1964)   Cited 24 times

    No. 8973. Argued September 27, 1963. Decided January 16, 1964. Joseph C. Thackery, Attorney, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Melvin Pollack, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner. William D. Macmillan, Sr., Baltimore, Md. (William A. Fisher, Jr., and James P. Garland, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for respondent, A.S. Abell Co. James J. Doyle, Jr., Baltimore, Md. (Sherbow, Shea Doyle and

  7. Meyer Dairy, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    429 F.2d 697 (10th Cir. 1970)   Cited 14 times

    No. 531-69. August 18, 1970. Charles W. Medley, Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner. Joseph C. Thackery, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Frank H. Itkin, N.L.R.B., with him on the brief), for respondent. Before PICKETT, HILL and HICKEY, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. Meyer Dairy Distributors Association, a group of milk distributors, petitioned the National Labor Relations Board, in accordance with the provisions of Section 9(c) of the National Labor Relations

  8. Herald Company v. N.L.R.B

    444 F.2d 430 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 13 times
    In Herald Company v. N.L.R.B., 444 F.2d 430 (2d Cir., decided June 11, 1971), the Court examined a factual situation similar to those found in Meyer Dairy and Carnation, supra, and reached a contrary result.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Brush-Moore Newspapers, Inc.

    413 F.2d 809 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 5 times
    In NLRB v. Brush-Moore Newspapers, Inc., 413 F.2d 809 (6th Cir. 1969), the court found that the dealers could not hold outside jobs or sell competing papers.

  10. Minnesota Milk Company v. N.L.R.B

    314 F.2d 761 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 7 times

    No. 16966. March 7, 1963. Thomas M. Vogt, St. Paul, Minn., made argument for petitioner; Felhaber, Larson Fenlon, St. Paul, Minn., with him on the brief. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for respondent; Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with him on the brief. Donald Savelkoul, Minneapolis, Minn., made argument for intervenor and