§

Newspaper and Mail Deliverers' Union, Etc.

152 N.L.R.B. 871 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Newspaper and Mail Deliverers' Union, Etc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Carey v. Westinghouse Corp.

    375 U.S. 261 (1964)   Cited 365 times
    Holding that Section 301 gives a federal court jurisdiction over a suit to enforce an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement even if the case is "truly a representation case" that could also be heard by the NLRB under Section 9 of the NLRA

  2. Labor Board v. Radio Engineers

    364 U.S. 573 (1961)   Cited 138 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[although] it might be better . . . to intrust [jurisdictional disputes] to arbitrators, . . . Congress, after discussion and consideration, decided to intrust this decision to the Board"

  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Epstein

    203 F.2d 482 (3d Cir. 1953)   Cited 23 times

    No. 10888. Argued January 23, 1953. Decided April 15, 1953. Rehearing Denied May 7, 1953. Harvey B. Diamond, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard Dunau, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. James M. Quigley, Harrisburg, Pa. (Samuel A. Schreckengaust, Jr., McNees, Wallace Nurick, Harrisburg, Pa., on the brief), for respondents. Before GOODRICH, STALEY