14 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.
420 U.S. 251 (1975) Cited 434 times 64 Legal AnalysesHolding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness
Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.
312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 506 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
Associated Press v. Labor Board
301 U.S. 103 (1937) Cited 257 timesHolding that the Associated Press's not-for-profit newsgathering activities "amount[ed] to commercial intercourse . . . within the meaning of the Constitution" because it "involve[d] the constant use of channels of interstate . . . communication"
Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966) Cited 56 timesUpholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ayer Lar Sanitarium
436 F.2d 45 (9th Cir. 1970) Cited 39 timesIn NLRB v. Ayer Lar Sanitarium, supra, 436 F.2d at 50, we said that the "test is whether the business reason or the... union activity is the moving cause behind the discharge.
McGraw-Edison Company v. N.L.R.B
419 F.2d 67 (8th Cir. 1969) Cited 33 timesNo. 19429. December 4, 1969. Paul S. Kuelthau, of Moller, Talent Kuelthau, St. Louis, for petitioner and filed brief and reply brief. John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Robertamarie Kiley, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief with Mr. Burgoyne. Charles A. Werner, St. Louis, Mo., for intervenor; Gibson Langsdale, Kansas
Vic Tanny International, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
622 F.2d 237 (6th Cir. 1980) Cited 19 timesStating that section 7 protects the concerted activities of both organized and unorganized employees
N.L.R.B. v. Georgia Rug Mill
308 F.2d 89 (5th Cir. 1962) Cited 22 timesNo. 19223. September 18, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before BROWN, WISDOM and BELL, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order that the respondent, Georgia Rug Mill, cease violating Section 8(a)(1) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §
N.L.R.B. v. Harry F. Berggren Sons, Inc.
406 F.2d 239 (8th Cir. 1969) Cited 15 timesEnforcing the Board's finding that an employer violated Section 8 by conducting a formal "poll" which took place in a non-coercive atmosphere, but which met only four of the five components of the Struksnes standard
National L.R.B. v. Giustina Bros. L
253 F.2d 371 (9th Cir. 1958) Cited 17 timesIn NLRB v. Giustina Bros. Lumber Co., 253 F.2d 371 (9th Cir. 1958), we held that Rule 102.46(b) prohibited the respondent from raising an issue before the Ninth Circuit where respondent's objection had been "so ambiguous as to be totally ineffective" in "adequately appris[ing]" the Board of the excepting party's intentions.
Section 651 - Congressional statement of findings and declaration of purpose and policy
29 U.S.C. § 651 Cited 1,499 times 19 Legal AnalysesNoting the OSH Act arose from concern surrounding "personal injuries and illnesses arising out of work situations"
Section 660 - Judicial review
29 U.S.C. § 660 Cited 899 times 29 Legal AnalysesPermitting review of orders of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission by filing a petition in a court of appeals