§

NEWPORT MEAT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC.

21-CA-209861 (N.L.R.B. Feb. 25, 2020)
NEWPORT MEAT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. Penasquitos Village, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    565 F.2d 1074 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 124 times
    Recognizing that "[t]he substantial evidence standard is not modified in any way when the Board and its examiner disagree"

  4. N. Mem'l Health Care v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    860 F.3d 639 (8th Cir. 2017)   Cited 6 times

    No. 16-3433 No. 16-3657 06-21-2017 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. North Memorial Health Care, Respondent Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the petitioner/cross-respondent was Thomas R. Trachsel, of Minneapolis, MN. In addition to Mr. Trachsel, the following attorney(s) appeared on the petitioner/cross-respondent brief—Meggen E. Lindsay, of Minneapolis, MN. Counsel who presented argument on

  5. Federated Logistics Operations v. N.L.R.B

    400 F.3d 920 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 16 times

    Nos. 03-1323, 03-1357. Argued September 14, 2004. Decided February 25, 2005. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Meir Feder argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Andrew M. Kramer and Julia M. Broas. Robert J. Englehart, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Homer D. Bronson Co.

    273 F. App'x 32 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 1 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 07-2447-ag. April 10, 2008. Application of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its Order, dated March 16, 2007, against Homer D. Bronson Company. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the application is GRANTED. Robert J. Englehart, Supervisory Attorney, Ruth E. Burdick, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, (Ronald Meisburg, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda

  7. America's Best Quality Coatings Corp. v. NLRB

    44 F.3d 516 (7th Cir. 1995)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 93-4039, 94-1173, and 94-1198. Argued October 4, 1994. Decided January 4, 1995. James R. Scott, Alan M. Levy (argued), Lindner Marsack, Milwaukee, WI, for petitioner. John C. Truesdale, Robert J. Englehart, Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, Linda J. Dreeben, Deborah E. Shrager (argued), Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, Joseph A. Szabo, Director, N.L.R.B., Milwaukee, WI, for N.L.R.B. Mary E. Leary (argued), Pittsburgh, PA, Terry Davis, Elizabeth Levie, United

  8. RHI HOLDINGS v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE

    47 F.3d 1161 (3d Cir. 1995)   Cited 1 times

    No. 94-1592. January 4, 1995. Appeal from the E.D.Pa., Yohn, J. AFFIRMED.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Dan Howard Mfg. Co.

    390 F.2d 304 (7th Cir. 1968)   Cited 16 times
    In Dan Howard, supra, 390 F.2d at page 309, we further stated: "The court [Sixth Circuit] pointed out that it is relevant to consider the subjective intention of the signer and his expressed state of mind in deciding whether a misapprehension was knowingly induced."

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease