§

Newell Porcelain Co

307 N.L.R.B. 877 (N.L.R.B. 1992)
Newell Porcelain Co

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Columbian Co.

    306 U.S. 292 (1939)   Cited 995 times
    Defining substantial evidence

  2. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 270 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Financial Institution Employees, Local 1182

    475 U.S. 192 (1986)   Cited 76 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that labor law prohibits the assignment or transfer of a collective bargaining agreement against the wishes of the workers for whom the agreement provides representation

  4. May Dept. Stores Co. v. N.L.R.B

    897 F.2d 221 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 10 times
    Observing that the Board compares pre- and post-merger unions for continuity by looking to the "structure, administration, officers, assets, membership, autonomy, by-laws, size, and territorial jurisdiction, with an eye toward changes in the rights and obligations of the union's leadership and membership, and in the relationships between the putative bargaining agent, its affiliate, and the employer"

  5. General Electric Company v. N.L.R.B

    412 F.2d 512 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 30 times
    Upholding NLRB's determination that unions do not commit unfair labor practices by insisting that employer bargain with mixed-union negotiating committee

  6. Seattle-First Nat. Bank v. N.L.R.B

    892 F.2d 792 (9th Cir. 1989)   Cited 8 times
    Distinguishing case where independent union "swallowed up by another local" on affiliation

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Insulfab Plastics, Inc.

    789 F.2d 961 (1st Cir. 1986)   Cited 10 times
    Upholding near unanimous election in 32-person union despite informal procedures

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Newspapers, Inc.

    515 F.2d 334 (5th Cir. 1975)   Cited 20 times

    No. 74-3004. June 27, 1975. Rehearing Denied August 29, 1975. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, John F. Depenbrock, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Louis V. Baldovin, Jr., Reg. Director, Region 23, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., for petitioner. Robert L. Ballow, Nashville, Tenn., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas Case). Before TUTTLE, GODBOLD and MORGAN, Circuit Judges: TUTTLE, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board

  9. Int'l United A., A., A. v. N.L.R.B

    394 F.2d 757 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 7 times
    In UAW, Pierce Governor Company operated a production facility in Anderson, Indiana, where the employees were represented by Local 940; for several decades, the “contracts had been made between the Company ‘and the International and its Local 940, jointly (herein called “the Union”), as the “exclusive bargaining agency” for the employees....’ ” Id. at 761 (emphasis added).