§

Newberry Mills, Inc.

141 N.L.R.B. 1167 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Newberry Mills, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Herman Sausage Co

    275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 79 times
    In NLRB v. Herman Sausage Co., 275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960), our circuit held that "generally speaking, the freedom to grant a unilateral wage increase "is limited to cases where there has been a bona fide but unsuccessful attempt to reach an agreement with the union, or where the union bears the guilt for having broken off relations.' NLRB v. Andrew Jergens Co., 9 Cir., 1949, 175 F.2d 130, 136, cert. denied, 338 U.S. 827, 70 S.Ct. 76, 94 L.Ed. 503.

  4. Local 833, Uaw-Afl-Cio, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    300 F.2d 699 (D.C. Cir. 1962)   Cited 40 times

    Nos. 15961, 16031, 16182. Argued September 11, 1961. Decided January 26, 1962. Certiorari Denied June 4, 1962. See 82 S.Ct. 1258. Mr. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., Washington, D.C., and Mr. Louis H. Pollak, New Haven, Conn., of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Connecticut, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. John Silard, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for Local 833, UAW-AFL-CIO, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, petitioner

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natl. Shoes

    208 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 29 times
    Deciding that the employerengaged in an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8 where the record contained evidence of “[l]ong delays unaccounted for in the matter of correspondence and the preparation of documents, the postponement of meetings of the negotiators for weeks at a time, and the reopening of questions previously settled”

  6. Armstrong Cork Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 27 times
    In Armstrong Cork Co. v. NLRB, 211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954), an employer announced to an assembly of workers shortly after a representation election that he intended to remove a "pledge" which the Company had posted on the bulletin board setting forth employees' rights.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Shannon

    208 F.2d 545 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 18 times

    No. 13644. December 14, 1953. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Owsley Vose, Rose Mary Filipowicz, Washington, D.C., Charles K. Hackler, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. James S. Duberg, Holmes E. Hobart, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and POPE, Circuit Judge, and DRIVER, District Judge. DENMAN, Chief Judge. This is a petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Taormina

    207 F.2d 251 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 16 times

    No. 14362. September 17, 1953. Ruth V. Reel, Atty., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, Elizabeth W. Weston, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Scott Toothaker, McAllen, Tex., Ewers, Cox Toothaker, McAllen, Tex., of counsel, for respondents. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and RIVES, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order of May 29, 1951, requiring respondents

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Altex Manufacturing Co.

    307 F.2d 872 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 1 times
    In NLRB v. Altex Mfg. Co., 307 F.2d 872 (4th Cir. 1962), the employer and the union agreed on January 12, 1960, that a collective bargaining contract which had previously expired on November 30, 1959, would be renewed and extended through June 30, 1960. They also agreed that negotiations for a successor contract to take effect on July 1, 1960, would be limited to wages and monetary issues, and that all other contract provisions in the preceding contract would remain in force in the successor contract.

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jones Fur. Mfg. Co.

    200 F.2d 774 (8th Cir. 1953)   Cited 4 times

    No. 14676. January 16, 1953. Lawrence B. Burrow, Jr., Little Rock, Ark. (Lawrence B. Burrow, Sr., Little Rock, Ark., on the brief), for respondent. Lewis C. Green, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, St. Louis, Mo. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Before SANBORN, WOODROUGH and RIDDICK, Circuit

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,104 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"