§

Newberry Equipment Co., Inc.

135 N.L.R.B. 747 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
Newberry Equipment Co., Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  2. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  3. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Herman Sausage Co

    275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 79 times
    In NLRB v. Herman Sausage Co., 275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960), our circuit held that "generally speaking, the freedom to grant a unilateral wage increase "is limited to cases where there has been a bona fide but unsuccessful attempt to reach an agreement with the union, or where the union bears the guilt for having broken off relations.' NLRB v. Andrew Jergens Co., 9 Cir., 1949, 175 F.2d 130, 136, cert. denied, 338 U.S. 827, 70 S.Ct. 76, 94 L.Ed. 503.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Howell Chevrolet Co.

    204 F.2d 79 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 53 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 204 F.2d 79, 86 (9th Cir. 1953), we recognized that "carriage, behavior, bearing, manner and appearance of a witness, — his demeanor, —" may cause the trier of fact to reject uncontradicted testimony.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation

  7. International Woodworkers of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    263 F.2d 483 (D.C. Cir. 1959)   Cited 17 times

    Nos. 14303, 14354. Argued December 8, 1958. Decided January 29, 1959. Mr. David E. Feller, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Arthur J. Goldberg and Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 14303. Miss Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., N.L.R.B., of the bar of the Court of Appeals of Kentucky, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kentucky Util. Co.

    182 F.2d 810 (6th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Kentucky Utilities Co., 6 Cir., 182 F.2d 810, we recognized the right of management to refuse to bargain with a certain representative of the Union under unusual facts clearly justifying such refusal.

  9. Butcher Boy Refrigerator Door Co. v. N.L.R.B

    290 F.2d 22 (7th Cir. 1961)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 13082, 13154. April 27, 1961. Rehearing Denied in No. 13082 June 9, 1961. Francis E. Hickey, Rockford, Ill., Kenneth C. McGuiness, Washington, D.C., for Butcher Boy. Bernard M. Mamet, Chicago, Ill., amicus curiae, for petitioner. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Robert Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Before DUFFY, SCHNACKENBERG and CASTLE, Circuit Judges. CASTLE, Circuit Judge. These cases are before the Court pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Model Mill Co.

    210 F.2d 829 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 5 times

    No. 11968. February 15, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George H. Armistead, Jr., and Charles J. Cornelius, Jr., Nashville, Tenn., for respondent. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This cause was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties; And the Court being of the opinion that the findings of the Board that the respondent had interfered with and restrained its employees

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"