§

New York University Medical Center

324 N.L.R.B. 887 (N.L.R.B. 1997)
New York University Medical Center

29 Cited authorities

  1. Mine Workers v. Bagwell

    512 U.S. 821 (1994)   Cited 1,431 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court's imposition of a fine is punitive if the contemnor has no opportunity to purge it through some action other than full payment once imposed

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 759 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"

  5. Longshoremen v. Davis

    476 U.S. 380 (1986)   Cited 319 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where "a state court . . . ha no subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate the issue . . ., any judgment issued by the state court will be void ab initio"

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yeshiva University

    444 U.S. 672 (1980)   Cited 183 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that all faculty members are managers for purposes of federal labor law even though they lack any legal instruments of control

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natural Gas Utility District

    402 U.S. 600 (1971)   Cited 187 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding utility district was political subdivision under that standard

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  9. Labor Board v. Cabot Carbon Co.

    360 U.S. 203 (1959)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding that "dealing with" as used in 29 U.S.C. § 152 is a "broad term" and is not synonymous to "bargaining with"

  10. Southwest Merchandising Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    53 F.3d 1334 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that the jury could infer pretext and unlawful discrimination from an employer's shifting and inconsistent explanations for its action