§

New York Typographical Union Number Six, ITU

144 N.L.R.B. 1555 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
New York Typographical Union Number Six, ITU

10 Cited authorities

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 881 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  2. Steele v. L. N.R. Co.

    323 U.S. 192 (1944)   Cited 959 times
    Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

  3. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  4. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  5. Labor Board v. News Syndicate Co.

    365 U.S. 695 (1961)   Cited 22 times
    In NLRB v. News Syndicate Co., 365 U.S. 695, 81 S.Ct. 849, 6 L.Ed.2d 29 (1961), where the bargaining unit included supervisors, the NLRB had found that both the employer and the union had committed unfair labor practices by operating an unlawful closed shop and preferential hiring system.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wallick

    198 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Wallick, 198 F.2d 477 (3 Cir. 1952), that court sustained a Board order requiring a respondent partnership which operated several enterprises engaged in the manufacture of ladies' garments to either reopen a plant which it had closed in violation of the Act because its employees had organized or give its employees an opportunity to work in other plants operated by the partnership.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Local 294, Int'l Bro. of Teamsters

    317 F.2d 746 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 13 times

    No. 234, Docket 27825. Argued January 29, 1963. Decided May 21, 1963. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallett-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gladys Kessler, atty., N.L.R.B.), for petitioner. Harry Pozefsky, Gloversville, N.Y., for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, HAYS, Circuit Judge, and DIMOCK, District Judge. HAYS, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of an order based

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Radio Officers' Union of Commercial Telegraphers Union

    196 F.2d 960 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 10 times

    No. 158, Docket 22191. Argued February 7, 1952. Decided May 6, 1952. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, and Owsley Vose and Willis S. Ryza, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, and Paul Kuelthau, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Butter Silverman, New York City, Abner H. Silverman, Emanuel Butter and Alexander C. Russotto, all of New York City, of counsel, for respondent. Before SWAN, Chief Judge

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Miranda Fuel Co.

    284 F.2d 861 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 2 times

    No. 70, Docket 26232. Argued November 2, 1960. Decided November 28, 1960. Herman M. Levy, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asso. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Melvin J. Welles, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Jack Last, New York City (Stanley B. Blumberg, of Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Local 553, International

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Brotherhood of Painters

    242 F.2d 477 (10th Cir. 1957)   Cited 4 times

    No. 5418. February 26, 1957. Melvin Pollack, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Stephen Leonard, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Owsley Vose, Washington, D.C., were on the brief), for petitioner. Philip Hornbein, Jr., Denver, Colo. (Hornbein Hornbein and Roy O. Goldin, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for respondents. Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and MURRAH and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. LEWIS, Circuit Judge. Petitioner, National Labor Relations Board, seeks enforcement of a remedial order issued by the