ยง

New York Typographical Union No. 6

242 N.L.R.B. 378 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
New York Typographical Union No. 6

7 Cited authorities

  1. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Longshoremen's W. U

    514 F.2d 481 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 21 times

    No. 73-3239. April 15, 1975. Elliott Moore, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Joseph E. Mayer, Robert Fulton Dashiell, Attys., NLRB, and Morris R. Bond, Sequim, Wash., for petitioner. Robert D. Duggan, Seattle, Wash. and Norman Leonard, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before DUNIWAY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT, District Judge. The Honorable William T. Sweigert, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. OPINION SWEIGERT, Senior

  3. Ted Hicks & Associates, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    572 F.2d 1024 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 13 times
    In Ted Hicks, however, a new master agreement was negotiated prior to the termination of the previous master agreement, and thus there was no gap period between master agreements.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Local 269

    357 F.2d 51 (3d Cir. 1966)   Cited 17 times

    No. 15268. Argued October 21, 1965. Decided February 4, 1966. Warren Davision, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Norton J. Come, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Linda R. Sher, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas L. Parsonnet, Newark, N.J. (Parsonnet Parsonnet, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for Local 269, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO

  5. N.L.R.B. v. International Longshore. Ass'n

    489 F.2d 635 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 9 times

    No. 73-1245. February 19, 1974. Rehearing Denied April 16, 1974. Elliott Moore, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Clifford W. Potter, Dir. Region 23, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., Joseph E. Mayer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Warner F. Brock, Gerald J. Goodwin, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Petition from National Labor Relations Board. Before WISDOM, COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 542, 542-A & 542-B, International Union of Operating Engineers

    485 F.2d 387 (3d Cir. 1973)   Cited 6 times

    No. 72-1837. Argued May 3, 1973. Decided September 20, 1973. Joseph T. Thackery, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin J. Vigderman, Freedman, Borowsky Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondents. Before HUNTER and WEIS, Circuit Judges, and SCALERA, District Judge. OPINION OF THE COURT SCALERA, District Judge. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT This matter comes before the court on application of the National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter Board), pursuant to ยง 10(e) of the National Labor Relations

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys