§

New Vista Nursing & Rehabilitation

22-CA-029845 (N.L.R.B. Nov. 21, 2011)
New Vista Nursing & Rehabilitation

12 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. Orders v. Stotts

    459 U.S. 969 (1982)   Cited 66 times

    No. 82-204. November 1, 1982. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 679 F. 2d 579.

  3. Bally's Park Place Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    646 F.3d 929 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 42 times
    Finding unlawful motive where employee's discharge came only days after manager observed him at pro-union rally

  4. Multi-Ad Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    255 F.3d 363 (7th Cir. 2001)   Cited 33 times
    Affirming Board's finding of coercive interrogation where an employee was asked "why he would want to bring a union into the company"

  5. Laro Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    56 F.3d 224 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Inferring discriminatory motive from, inter alia, an employer's professed desire to hire the best qualified workers and the employer's subsequent decision to hire employees with no relevant experience over union members with experience

  6. McClung v. Smith

    89 F.3d 829 (4th Cir. 1996)   Cited 15 times
    Approving fixed-rate pay structure under § 778.309 where "there was a clear understanding . . . overtime and wages [were] included in the 12-hour day"

  7. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  8. Matson Terminals, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    114 F.3d 300 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that although evidence supported the company's position that the challenged promotions were part of a planned reorganization, substantial evidence also supported the Board's conclusion that the timing of the promotions was part of an unlawful effort to interfere with unionization

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Orland Park Motor Cars

    309 F.3d 452 (7th Cir. 2002)   Cited 1 times

    No. 01-2894. Argued April 16, 2002. Decided October 29, 2002. Appeal from the Court of Appeals, Coffey, Circuit Judge. Elizabeth Kinney, National Labor Relations Board, Region 13, Chicago, IL, Aileen Armstrong, Usha Dheenan (Argued), National Labor Relations Board, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Robert E. Bloch (Argued), Dowd, Bloch Bennett, Chicago, IL, for Intervenor. James F. Hendricks (Argued), Fisher Phillips, Chicago, IL, for Respondent. Before CUDAHY, COFFEY

  10. United Oil Mfg. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    672 F.2d 1208 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 5 times

    No. 81-1478. Argued October 27, 1981. Decided February 22, 1982. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied May 17, 1982. Richard H. Zamboldi (argued), Richard W. Perhacs, Elderkin, Martin, Kelly, Messina Zamboldi, Erie, Pa., for petitioner. David A. Fleischer (argued), William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review