New Orleans Board of Trade, Ltd.

11 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 712 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 471 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
N.L.R.B. v. Marcus Trucking Co.
286 F.2d 583 (2d Cir. 1961) Cited 65 times
Treating application of undisputed legal standard to facts as “question of fact” subject to “substantial evidence” standard of § 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act
W.W. Cross Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board
174 F.2d 875 (1st Cir. 1949) Cited 52 times
Holding that " 'wages' " in the NLRA "embraces within its meaning direct and immediate economic benefits flowing from the employment relationship covers a group insurance program"
N.L.R.B. v. Citizens Hotel Company
326 F.2d 501 (5th Cir. 1964) Cited 29 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Citizens Hotel Co., 5 Cir., 326 F.2d 501, dealing with a somewhat similar unilateral termination of a bonus, we stated: "There was, therefore, an impermissible unilateral change constituting a failure to bargain."
N.L.R.B. v. Electric Steam Radiator Corp.
321 F.2d 733 (6th Cir. 1963) Cited 28 times
Containing similar language
Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Company v. N.L.R.B
284 F.2d 74 (9th Cir. 1960) Cited 17 times
In Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel the court found that poor productivity was a valid business justification for refusing to pay a Christmas bonus to production and maintenance workers who had been on strike.
Singer Mfg. Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board
119 F.2d 131 (7th Cir. 1941) Cited 37 times
In Singer Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 119 F.2d 131, 134, the court said: "* * * The greatest of rascals may solemnly affirm his honesty of purpose; that does not foreclose a jury from finding from the evidence submitted that he possesses no trace of such innocent quality.
General Telephone Company of Fla. v. N.L.R.B
337 F.2d 452 (5th Cir. 1964) Cited 10 times
No. 20866. October 2, 1964. William Terrell Hodges, Hugh C. MacFarlane and MacFarlane, Ferguson, Allison Kelly, Tampa, Fla., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asso. Gen. Counsel, Stephen B. Goldberg, Atty., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Joseph C. Thackery, Attorney, N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, WISDOM, Circuit Judge, and McRAE, District Judge. McRAE, District Judge. This case is before the Court upon petition
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Niles-Bement-Pond
199 F.2d 713 (2d Cir. 1952) Cited 20 times
Upholding a Board finding that a Christmas bonus paid "over a substantial period of time and in amount . . . based on the respective wages earned by the recipients" were "wages"

New Orleans Board of Trade, Ltd.

11 Cited authorities

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Treating application of undisputed legal standard to facts as “question of fact” subject to “substantial evidence” standard of § 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act

Holding that " 'wages' " in the NLRA "embraces within its meaning direct and immediate economic benefits flowing from the employment relationship covers a group insurance program"

In N.L.R.B. v. Citizens Hotel Co., 5 Cir., 326 F.2d 501, dealing with a somewhat similar unilateral termination of a bonus, we stated: "There was, therefore, an impermissible unilateral change constituting a failure to bargain."

Containing similar language

In Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel the court found that poor productivity was a valid business justification for refusing to pay a Christmas bonus to production and maintenance workers who had been on strike.

In Singer Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 119 F.2d 131, 134, the court said: "* * * The greatest of rascals may solemnly affirm his honesty of purpose; that does not foreclose a jury from finding from the evidence submitted that he possesses no trace of such innocent quality.

Upholding a Board finding that a Christmas bonus paid "over a substantial period of time and in amount . . . based on the respective wages earned by the recipients" were "wages"