Neuman Transit Co., Inc.
4 Cited authorities
Machinists Local v. Labor Board
362 U.S. 411 (1960) Cited 276 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely
Garment Workers v. Labor Board
366 U.S. 731 (1961) Cited 213 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hannaford Bros. Co.
261 F.2d 638 (1st Cir. 1959) Cited 14 timesNo. 5382. December 11, 1958. Rehearing Denied January 6, 1959. Eugene Adams Keeney, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Asso. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Herbert H. Bennett, Portland, Me., with whom Mayo S. Levenson, Portland, Me., was on brief, for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. MAGRUDER
N.L.R.B. v. H. Rohtstein Co.
266 F.2d 407 (1st Cir. 1959) Cited 11 timesIn NLRB v. Rohtstein Co., 266 F.2d 407, 409 (CA1, 1959), the First Circuit held that similar misrepresentations invalidated a card necessary for a majority, and therefore declined to enforce the Board's bargaining order.