Network Dynamics

7 Cited authorities

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 358 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Mervin v. F.T.C.
591 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1978) Cited 79 times
Holding that the reviewing court correctly places the burden of proof on the plaintiff seeking amendment
In re Convergent Technol. Sec. Hf. 1984 Secs. Litig
122 F.R.D. 555 (N.D. Cal. 1988) Cited 27 times 1 Legal Analyses
Contemplating that a party subpoenaing a statement from a non-friendly witness cannot succeed without proving that opposing counsel affirmatively waived the work product privilege and that even the statement of a friendly witness could not be obtained or reviewed by the defendant "until [the witness] offers testimony (in deposition or at trial) which is based on refreshing his recollection from his statement or until plaintiffs' counsel cross-examine him on the basis of his statement"
Powell v. United States Dept. of Justice
584 F. Supp. 1508 (N.D. Cal. 1984) Cited 30 times
In Powell v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 584 F.Supp. (N.D. Cal. 1984), the district court cited case authority for the application of FOIA exemption 6, which included consideration of the plaintiff's interest in disclosure.
N.L.R.B. v. Chicago Metallic Corp.
794 F.2d 527 (9th Cir. 1986) Cited 14 times
In Chicago Metallic, unlike the situation presented here, the employee at issue was assigned no manual chores and had the authority and discretion to take disciplinary action against employees.
Southern Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
954 F.2d 700 (11th Cir. 1992) Cited 3 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Southern Serv., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 954 F.2d 700 (11th Cir. 1992), the Eleventh Circuit upheld a Board determination that a contractor providing janitorial services at a Coca-Cola manufacturer's site enjoyed the same organizational rights under the Act as the employer's employees did.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. S. Bleachery
257 F.2d 235 (4th Cir. 1958) Cited 33 times 1 Legal Analyses
Stating that the essential inquiry is whether the employer shares the power of management

Network Dynamics

7 Cited authorities

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Mervin v. F.T.C.

Holding that the reviewing court correctly places the burden of proof on the plaintiff seeking amendment

In re Convergent Technol. Sec. Hf. 1984 Secs. Litig

Powell v. United States Dept. of Justice

In Powell v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 584 F.Supp. (N.D. Cal. 1984), the district court cited case authority for the application of FOIA exemption 6, which included consideration of the plaintiff's interest in disclosure.

N.L.R.B. v. Chicago Metallic Corp.

In Chicago Metallic, unlike the situation presented here, the employee at issue was assigned no manual chores and had the authority and discretion to take disciplinary action against employees.

Southern Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

In Southern Serv., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 954 F.2d 700 (11th Cir. 1992), the Eleventh Circuit upheld a Board determination that a contractor providing janitorial services at a Coca-Cola manufacturer's site enjoyed the same organizational rights under the Act as the employer's employees did.

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. S. Bleachery

Stating that the essential inquiry is whether the employer shares the power of management