§

Neodron, Ltd.

IPR2020-00282 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 15, 2020)
Neodron, Ltd.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Pers. Web Techs., LLC v. Apple, Inc.

    848 F.3d 987 (Fed. Cir. 2017)   Cited 66 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the Board provided an inadequate analysis to provide meaningful appellate review

  2. In re Magnum Oil Tools Int'l, Ltd.

    829 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2016)   Cited 61 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that conclusory statements that "[t]he same analysis" applied to different prior art did not provide sufficient evidence to base its legal conclusion of obviousness

  3. Stumbo v. Eastman Outdoors

    508 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2007)   Cited 63 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an expert's statement "in conclusory fashion" that two methods were not "significantly different" is the type of "cursory conclusion" that "will not withstand summary judgment."

  4. Bayer Cropscience AG v. DOW Agrosciences LLC

    851 F.3d 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2017)   Cited 45 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding exceptional case status where the plaintiff took positions "directly contradicted by the record evidence Bayer had obtained through early discovery" and "marched onward with a view of its case that was not supported by its witnesses."

  5. Mentor Graphics v. Quickturn Des. Sys

    150 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 1998)   Cited 57 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding privity between two companies, even though the assignor company did not assist in developing the accused product

  6. Application of Wilson

    424 F.2d 1382 (C.C.P.A. 1970)   Cited 3 times
    Noting that the court cannot ignore the specific language in a claim

  7. Section 311 - Inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 311   Cited 406 times   192 Legal Analyses
    Establishing grounds and scope of IPR proceeding

  8. Section 322 - Petitions

    35 U.S.C. § 322   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) REQUIREMENTS OF PETITION.-A petition filed under section 321 may be considered only if- (1) the petition is accompanied by payment of the fee established by the Director under section 321; (2) the petition identifies all real parties in interest; (3) the petition identifies, in writing and with particularity, each claim challenged, the grounds on which the challenge to each claim is based, and the evidence that supports the grounds for the challenge to each claim, including- (A) copies of patents

  9. Section 42.71 - Decision on petitions or motions

    37 C.F.R. § 42.71   Cited 22 times   44 Legal Analyses

    (a)Order of consideration. The Board may take up petitions or motions for decisions in any order, may grant, deny, or dismiss any petition or motion, and may enter any appropriate order. (b)Interlocutory decisions. A decision on a motion without a judgment is not final for the purposes of judicial review. If a decision is not a panel decision, the party may request that a panel rehear the decision. When rehearing a non-panel decision, a panel will review the decision for an abuse of discretion. A