Neaton Auto Products Mfg.
4 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23
484 U.S. 112 (1987) Cited 350 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that a federal court has no authority to review a decision of the NLRB's General Counsel dismissing an unfair labor practice complaint pursuant to an informal settlement in which the charging party refused to join
Auto Workers v. Scofield
382 U.S. 205 (1965) Cited 111 timesRecognizing intervenor interest in avoiding future deference whether "as a matter of stare decisis or comity"
American Postal Wkrs. Un., Afl-Cio v. N.L.R.B
370 F.3d 25 (D.C. Cir. 2004) Cited 6 timesNo. 03-1322. Argued May 11, 2004. Decided June 4, 2004. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. James B. Coppess argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Anton G. Hajjar, Lynn K. Rhinehart, and Laurence S. Gold. Linda Dreeben, Assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong
Hospital Service Employees U. v. N.L.R.B
798 F.2d 1245 (9th Cir. 1986) Cited 5 timesHolding that actual notice to employer satisfied statutory notice requirements, even though copy of charges was mailed to address at which employer had not conducted business for about a year and the NLRB could not produce a return receipt indicating delivery of the charges