NCR Corp.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent
  2. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Magnavox Co. of Tennessee

    415 U.S. 322 (1974)   Cited 76 times
    In Magnavox, the Board changed its bifurcated rule and adopted the Eighth Circuit's view that the union had no power to waive employee distribution rights on behalf of either itself or another union.
  4. Southern Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    954 F.2d 700 (11th Cir. 1992)   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Southern Serv., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 954 F.2d 700 (11th Cir. 1992), the Eleventh Circuit upheld a Board determination that a contractor providing janitorial services at a Coca-Cola manufacturer's site enjoyed the same organizational rights under the Act as the employer's employees did.
  5. Great Lakes Steel v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    625 F.2d 131 (6th Cir. 1980)   Cited 4 times

    No. 78-1299. July 15, 1980. Jacques M. Wood, Joseph Mack, III, Thorp, Reed Armstrong, Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, William Wachter, Patricia Matthews, Ruah D. Lahey, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Bernard Gottfried, Director, Region 7, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before LIVELY, MERRITT and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges. ORDER The company, Great Lakes Steel, petitions this Court for

  6. Korn Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    389 F.2d 117 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that an employer need not produce information that is not available to it for the purpose of supplying the union with information requested