§
Naum Bros., Inc.

24 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

  4. United States v. Stoehr

    196 F.2d 276 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 96 times
    Finding that offer in compromise filed long after taxpayer learned of tax liability and without his having made any payment on the amount owed "destroyed whatever probative value a prompt offer might have had."

  5. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  6. Jays Foods, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    573 F.2d 438 (7th Cir. 1978)   Cited 22 times
    Concluding that work could be re-contracted for legitimate business reasons, with the effect that discriminatees were placed on an "employment merry-go-round"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Okla-Inn

    488 F.2d 498 (10th Cir. 1973)   Cited 27 times

    No. 72-1737. Argued and Submitted May 22, 1973. Decided October 26, 1973. Rehearing Denied January 23, 1974. Elliott Moore, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, Russell H. Gardner, William F. Wachter, Marjorie S. Godfreed, Peter G. Nash, John S. Irving, and Patrick Hardin, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. C. A. Kothe and Richard L. Barnes, Koths Eagleton, Inc., Tulsa, Okl., for respondent. John M. Keefer, Jarboe Keefer, Tulsa, Okl., for intervenor. Before SETH and DOYLE, Circuit Judges, and LARAMORE, Senior

  8. International Un., United A., A. v. N.L.R.B

    363 F.2d 702 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 34 times
    Rejecting argument NLRB used section 8(c) protected statements as "as some evidence of the unfair labor practices themselves" and concluding statements were used only to "place . . . other acts in context"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co.

    351 F.2d 693 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 33 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co., 8 Cir., 351 F.2d 693, also decided since this case was submitted, this court stated that if the factual conclusion of the Board is based upon substantial evidence on the whole record, this court must accept such factual determination as binding. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 354 F.2d 432, decided December 29, 1965, adheres to these principles.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Broadmoor Lumber Co.

    578 F.2d 238 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 12 times

    No. 77-1874. June 16, 1978. Rehearing Denied July 12, 1978. Howard F. Fine (argued), Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harry Finkle (argued), of Littler, Mendelson Fastiff, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge. The Honorable William G. East, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. KILKENNY, Circuit Judge: