§

National Upholstering Co.

311 N.L.R.B. 1204 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
National Upholstering Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers

    434 U.S. 335 (1978)   Cited 286 times
    Affirming a cease and desist order issued by the National Labor Relations Board to a striking, uncertified union, which the union alleged was inconsistent with a prior ruling of the agency

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.

    494 U.S. 775 (1990)   Cited 177 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board has "considerable deference" in determining the legal rule to apply and should be upheld "as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act"

  3. Bickerstaff Clay Products Co., v. N.L.R.B

    871 F.2d 980 (11th Cir. 1989)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that union certified as exclusive bargaining agent "is entitled to a continuing presumption of majority status"

  4. Whisper Soft Mills, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    754 F.2d 1381 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 20 times

    Nos. 83-7717, 83-7813 and 83-7840. Argued and Submitted September 13, 1984. Decided October 31, 1984. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En banc March 11, 1985. Stefan M. Mason, Mason Mason, Los Angeles, Cal., Sanford N. Nathan, Neyhart, Anderson, Nussbaum, Reilly Freitas, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Susan Williams, Elliott Moore, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition to Review a Decision of the United States National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRILL, ALARCON

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Buckley Broadcasting Corp.

    891 F.2d 230 (9th Cir. 1989)   Cited 13 times
    Giving dispositive weight to the third factor, noting, “Buckley's argument fails under the third factor. There is no possibility of an inequitable result from retroactive application of the Board's new standard because the new standard works to Buckley's advantage.”

  6. May Dept. Stores Co. v. N.L.R.B

    897 F.2d 221 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 10 times
    Observing that the Board compares pre- and post-merger unions for continuity by looking to the "structure, administration, officers, assets, membership, autonomy, by-laws, size, and territorial jurisdiction, with an eye toward changes in the rights and obligations of the union's leadership and membership, and in the relationships between the putative bargaining agent, its affiliate, and the employer"

  7. General Electric Company v. N.L.R.B

    412 F.2d 512 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 30 times
    Upholding NLRB's determination that unions do not commit unfair labor practices by insisting that employer bargain with mixed-union negotiating committee

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Flex Plastics, Inc.

    726 F.2d 272 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 13 times
    Rejecting argument that union "inaction" was legitimate basis for withdrawal of recognition: "The Company had no evidence that the Union-employee relationship was not an active one, only that the Union-management relationship was inactive."

  9. News/Sun Sentinel Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    890 F.2d 430 (D.C. Cir. 1989)   Cited 6 times
    Challenging employer has burden of proving discontinuity, and Board findings regarding continuity are conclusive if supported by substantial record evidence

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Imperial House Condominium, Inc.

    831 F.2d 999 (11th Cir. 1987)   Cited 6 times

    No. 86-5756. November 6, 1987. Elliot Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Peter Winkler, Patrick Szymanski, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Richard I. Manas, Manas Marcus, P.A., Miami, Fla., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before JOHNSON and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and HOFFMAN, Senior District Judge. Honorable Walter E. Hoffman, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation. EDMONDSON