§

National Steel Corp.

242 N.L.R.B. 294 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
National Steel Corp.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 512 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

  2. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  3. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”

  4. Dist. 65, Distrib. Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    593 F.2d 1155 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 77-1239, 77-1367. Argued May 4, 1978. Decided September 26, 1978. Andrew Tranovich, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., a member of the bar of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for the National Labor Relations Board, petitioner in No. 77-1367 and respondent in No. 77-1239. Lewis M. Steel, New York City, with whom Eugene G. Eisner

  5. Rubin Bros. Footwear v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    203 F.2d 486 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 17 times
    In Rubin Bros. Footwear v. National Labor Relations Bd., 203 F.2d 486 (C.C.A. 5th), the Court said: "If anything is settled in labor law and under the act, we think it is that membership in a union does not guarantee the member against a discharge as such. It affords protection against discharge only where it is established that the discharge is because of union activity."

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.

    356 F.2d 955 (1st Cir. 1966)   Cited 5 times

    No. 6442. Heard September 13, 1965. Decided March 2, 1966. Morton Namrow, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Herbert Burstein, New York City, with whom Zelby Burstein, New York City, was on brief, for respondents. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, J. WARREN MADDEN, Senior Judge, and JULIAN, District Judge

  7. N.L.R.B. v. I. Posner, Inc.

    304 F.2d 773 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 6 times

    No. 332, Docket 27342. Submitted April 23, 1962. Decided July 3, 1962. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Leo N. McGuire, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Leight, Drimmer Weinstein, New York City, and Murray A. Frank, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Burton H. Zuckerman, New York City, of counsel), for respondents. Before FRIENDLY, SMITH and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. SMITH, Circuit