National School Slate Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"
  2. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natl. Shoes

    208 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 29 times
    Deciding that the employerengaged in an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8 where the record contained evidence of “[l]ong delays unaccounted for in the matter of correspondence and the preparation of documents, the postponement of meetings of the negotiators for weeks at a time, and the reopening of questions previously settled”
  5. National Labor Rel. B. v. Stanislaus Imp. H

    226 F.2d 377 (9th Cir. 1955)   Cited 24 times

    No. 14358. October 12, 1955. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Jean Engstrom, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., George O'Brien, Atty., N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. David E. Lombardi, Richard Ernst, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before HEALY and FEE, Circuit Judges, and JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge. JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge. This is a petition to enforce an order

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Cascade Employers Association, Inc.

    296 F.2d 42 (9th Cir. 1961)   Cited 8 times

    No. 17012. October 20, 1961. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Earle W. Putnam, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Carney McCarroll and Richard R. Carney, Portland, Or., amicus curiae. Koerner, Young, McColloch Dezendorf, Lewis K. Scott, Portland, Or., for respondent. Before CHAMBERS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and WOLLENBERG, District Judge. WOLLENBERG, District Judge. This

  7. Division 1142, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    294 F.2d 264 (D.C. Cir. 1961)   Cited 4 times

    No. 16007. Argued May 15, 1961. Decided July 6, 1961. Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied En Banc September 12, 1961. Mr. George Schatzki, Dallas, Tex., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Texas, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, and Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Mr. Bernard Cushman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mrs. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel

  8. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"