National Metal Processing

9 Cited authorities

John Wiley Sons v. Livingston
376 U.S. 543 (1964) Cited 1,771 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a court should decide whether an arbitration agreement survived a corporate merger and bound the resulting corporation
Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
482 U.S. 27 (1987) Cited 369 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors
Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
414 U.S. 168 (1973) Cited 497 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.
406 U.S. 272 (1972) Cited 478 times 49 Legal Analyses
Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
Boire v. Greyhound Corp.
376 U.S. 473 (1964) Cited 426 times 3 Legal Analyses
Finding status of employer as independent contractor is immaterial because focus of joint employment inquiry is on employees, not employers
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.
691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982) Cited 339 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that joint employer situation exists only when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"
N.L.R.B. v. Jeffries Lithograph Co.
752 F.2d 459 (9th Cir. 1985) Cited 49 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding continuity where successor retained essentially same workforce in same plant doing same jobs under same supervisor with some of the same equipment, providing similar services
Munir v. Scott
12 F.3d 213 (6th Cir. 1993) Cited 19 times
Listing substantially similar factors
Premium Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
709 F.2d 623 (9th Cir. 1983) Cited 31 times
Holding that employees' requests for withdrawal cards, even if such requests indicated that the employees no longer wished to be members of the union, did “not necessarily indicate that [they] no longer wish to be represented by it”

National Metal Processing

9 Cited authorities

Holding that a court should decide whether an arbitration agreement survived a corporate merger and bound the resulting corporation

Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

Finding status of employer as independent contractor is immaterial because focus of joint employment inquiry is on employees, not employers

Holding that joint employer situation exists only when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"

Finding continuity where successor retained essentially same workforce in same plant doing same jobs under same supervisor with some of the same equipment, providing similar services

Listing substantially similar factors

Holding that employees' requests for withdrawal cards, even if such requests indicated that the employees no longer wished to be members of the union, did “not necessarily indicate that [they] no longer wish to be represented by it”