17 Cited authorities
Garment Workers v. Labor Board
366 U.S. 731 (1961) Cited 213 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support
Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.
311 U.S. 584 (1941) Cited 338 timesFinding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"
Labor Board v. Southern Bell Co.
319 U.S. 50 (1943) Cited 42 timesIn Seber, the United States Supreme Court addressed a similar statute which provided that certain Indian lands would be immune from state taxes if two requirements were met: that the title to the lands be held by an Indian subject to restrictions against alienation or encumbrance or approval of the Secretary of the Interior; and the lands were purchased out of trust or restricted funds.
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Condenser Corp.
128 F.2d 67 (3d Cir. 1942) Cited 62 timesNo. 7683. Argued January 5, 1942. Decided March 25, 1942. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board against Condenser Corporation of America and Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corporation, and Electrical Condensers Union, Local B-1041, of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, intervenor. A petition for leave to adduce additional evidence was filed. Petition for an enforcing decree granted with
National Labor Rel. Board v. Baltimore T. Co.
140 F.2d 51 (4th Cir. 1944) Cited 57 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Baltimore T. Co., 4 Cir., 140 F.2d 51, the court alluded with apparent approval to the fact that the Board had endeavored to avoid making its sanctions operate retroactively.
N.L.R.B. v. John S. Swift Company
302 F.2d 342 (7th Cir. 1962) Cited 21 timesExcluding "the period during which the bargaining relationship was suspended by litigation of the Company's unfair labor practices"
National Labor Rel. v. Broderick Wood
261 F.2d 548 (10th Cir. 1958) Cited 16 timesIn NLRB v. Broderick Wood Prod. Co., 10 Cir., 261 F.2d 548, 556, it was said: "Here, the union-security clause was the very basis for the charge of unfair labor practices. It was the union-security clause that Teamsters were enforcing when demanding that the employees be discharged.
Dixie Bedding Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B
268 F.2d 901 (5th Cir. 1959) Cited 14 timesNo. 17484. June 30, 1959. Abraham H. Shukat, Miami Beach, Fla., for petitioner. Fred S. Landess, Atty., N.L.R.B., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before JONES, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. JONES, Circuit Judge. The petitioner, Dixie Bedding Manufacturing Company, seeks review
N.L.R.B. v. Sightseeing Guides
310 F.2d 40 (2d Cir. 1962) Cited 10 timesIn N L R B v. Sightseeing Guides and Lecturers Union, 310 F.2d 40 (2d Cir. 1962) the Court of Appeals for this circuit affirmed a decision of the National Labor Relations Board and held that the sightseeing bus tours industry in the City of New York affected interstate commerce, pointing out that a significant portion of their business is secured from out of town travel agents and railroad agents.
National Labor Rel. Board v. Standard Oil Co.
138 F.2d 885 (2d Cir. 1943) Cited 26 timesIn Labor Board v. Standard Oil Co., 138 F.2d 885, 887, Judge Learned Hand said, "We understand the law to be that the decision of the Board upon that issue is for all practical purposes not open to us at all; certainly not after we have once decided that there was `substantial' evidence that the `disestablished' union was immediately preceded by a period during which there was a `dominated' union....