National Broadcasting Co., Inc.

8 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 265 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.
351 U.S. 105 (1956) Cited 294 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B
347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965) Cited 55 times
Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"
N.L.R.B. v. Rockwell-Standard, Trans. Axle
410 F.2d 953 (6th Cir. 1969) Cited 44 times
No. 18651. May 29, 1969. Leonard M. Wagman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Neal J. Conway, Atty., Washington, D.C., on brief. Leonard L. Scheinholtz, Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent, Jonathan L. Alder, Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., on brief. Before PHILLIPS, EDWARDS and PECK, Circuit Judges. Judge Edwards took no part in the consideration of decision of this case
Fafnir Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B
362 F.2d 716 (2d Cir. 1966) Cited 24 times
Relying upon the “clear and unmistakable waiver” rule
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yawman & Erbe Mfg. Co.
187 F.2d 947 (2d Cir. 1951) Cited 34 times
No. 107, Docket 21789. Argued February 7, 1951. Decided March 28, 1951. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Raymond M. Norton, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Nixon, Hargrave, Middleton Devans, Rochester, N.Y., for respondent; Arthur L. Stern and William H. Morris, Rochester, N Y, of counsel. Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRANK,
J.I. Case Company v. National Labor Rel. Board
253 F.2d 149 (7th Cir. 1958) Cited 20 times
In J.I. Case we simply noted that a union has, absent a showing of relevance, no "`per se' right to information" it requests from an employer during the course of collective bargaining.

National Broadcasting Co., Inc.

8 Cited authorities

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

Relying upon the “clear and unmistakable waiver” rule

In J.I. Case we simply noted that a union has, absent a showing of relevance, no "`per se' right to information" it requests from an employer during the course of collective bargaining.