§

National Broadcasting Co.

352 N.L.R.B. 90 (N.L.R.B. 2008)
National Broadcasting Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  2. United States Testing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    160 F.3d 14 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 18 times
    Rejecting employer's contention that it had insufficient notice regarding the potential relevance of a union request for individual insurance claims information because "context is everything," and the employer "put on the table" the concern of growing health care costs

  3. N.L.R.B. v. George Koch Sons, Inc.

    950 F.2d 1324 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 16 times
    Finding that employer "waived the issue of deadlock by failing to present evidence of deadlock before the ALJ"

  4. Crowley Marine Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    234 F.3d 1295 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 6 times
    Upholding the Board’s finding of a violation where "the information was sought and needed to enable the Union to make an informed judgment" about pursuing contract violation remedies

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Leonard B. Hebert, Jr. Co.

    696 F.2d 1120 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that the union "has the initial burden of showing relevancy" where it alleges that the employer is using "double breasted operations" to evade contractual obligations with the union, i.e., the employer is allegedly operating two corporations, one hiring strictly union employees, and the other, nonunion employees, to compete for both union and nonunion work

  6. Cook Paint Varnish Co. v. N.L.R.B

    648 F.2d 712 (D.C. Cir. 1981)   Cited 9 times
    Holding that an employer may threaten an employee with discipline in seeking to compel compliance with investigatory questions regarding employee misconduct if the employer's inquiry is still in the investigatory stages

  7. Goodyear Atomic Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    738 F.2d 155 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 83-5407, 83-5509. Argued May 8, 1984. Decided July 3, 1984. John B. Rayson, E.H. Rayson (argued), Kramer, Johnson, Rayson, McVeigh Leake, Knoxville, Tenn., Arthur L. Sutton, Akron, Ohio, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Gen. Counsel, C.S. Stocking (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before EDWARDS and CONTIE, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM. This case is before the