§

Nassau-Suffolk Chapter of the National Electrical Contractors' Association, Inc.

215 N.L.R.B. 894 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Nassau-Suffolk Chapter of the National Electrical Contractors' Association, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  3. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Local 269

    357 F.2d 51 (3d Cir. 1966)   Cited 17 times

    No. 15268. Argued October 21, 1965. Decided February 4, 1966. Warren Davision, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Norton J. Come, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Linda R. Sher, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas L. Parsonnet, Newark, N.J. (Parsonnet Parsonnet, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for Local 269, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. E.F. Shuck Const

    243 F.2d 519 (9th Cir. 1957)   Cited 7 times

    No. 15084. January 15, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Morris A. Solomon, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Lycette, Diamond Sylvester, Lyle I. Iversen, Seattle, Wash., for respondent Associated Gen. Contractors of America. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, and MURRAY, District Judge. DENMAN, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks our enforcement of its order finding the respondent