§

Naples Community Hospital, Inc.

12-CA-025689 (N.L.R.B. Feb. 4, 2009)
Naples Community Hospital, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 656 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Beth Israel Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 483 (1978)   Cited 221 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the context of solicitation rules, such circumstances are required to justify restrictions on solicitation during nonworking time

  3. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Dyer v. MacDougall

    201 F.2d 265 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 321 times
    Holding that witness demeanor may persuade a jury to "assume the truth of what he denied," but a court cannot allow a case to go to the jury on such evidence

  6. U.S. v. Smith

    123 F.3d 140 (3d Cir. 1997)   Cited 72 times
    Noting that while "[w]e cannot restore the secrecy that has already been lost . . . we can grant partial relief by preventing further disclosure."

  7. Dole v. Milonas

    889 F.2d 885 (9th Cir. 1989)   Cited 75 times
    Recognizing that "the district court may adopt the 'privilege log' approach"

  8. Guardian Industries Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    49 F.3d 317 (7th Cir. 1995)   Cited 16 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 94-2388, 94-2664. Argued January 18, 1995. Decided February 28, 1995. Todd M. Nierman (argued), Michael R. Maine, Baker Daniels, Indianapolis, IN, for petitioner. Charles P. Donnelly, Jr., Joseph Oertel (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, Saudria Bordone, Joanne Krause, N.L.R.B., Region 25, Indianapolis, IN, for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before COFFEY

  9. National Labor Rel. Brd. v. Detroit Newspapers

    185 F.3d 602 (6th Cir. 1999)   Cited 7 times
    Concluding that "district court had the obligation ... to determine whether the subpoenaed documents were protected by some privilege, and had no discretion to delegate that duty"

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Saint Vincent's Hosp

    729 F.2d 730 (11th Cir. 1984)   Cited 4 times

    No. 83-7203. April 9, 1984. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Peter M. Bernstein and Ellen A. Farrell, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harry L. Hopkins, Lang, Simpson, Robinson Sommerville, Birmingham, Ala., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. Honorable Edward S. Smith, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. GODBOLD, Chief Judge: