§

Nancy McGuire, et al., Complainant , v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

01985492 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 17, 2000)
Nancy McGuire, et al., Complainant , v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Gen. Tel. Co. of Sw. v. Falcon

    457 U.S. 147 (1982)   Cited 5,834 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that named plaintiff must prove “much more than the validity of his own claim”; the individual plaintiff must show that “the individual's claim and the class claims will share common questions of law or fact and that the individual's claim will be typical of the class claims,” explicitly referencing the “commonality” and “typicality” requirements of Rule 23

  2. East Texas Motor Freight v. Rodriguez

    431 U.S. 395 (1977)   Cited 1,322 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs who lacked qualifications to be hired as drivers suffered no injury from alleged discriminatory practices and therefore lacked standing to represent class of persons who did suffer injury

  3. Schlesinger v. Reservists to Stop the War

    418 U.S. 208 (1974)   Cited 1,156 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "generalized interest of all citizens in constitutional governance" cannot confer standing

  4. Lilly v. Harris-Teeter Supermarket

    720 F.2d 326 (4th Cir. 1983)   Cited 74 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[c]ertification is only concerned with the commonality (not the apparent merit) of the claims and the existence of a sufficiently numerous group of persons who may assert those claims . . ."