Nabors Trailers, Inc.

N.L.R.B. v. Mar-Len Cabinets, Inc.
659 F.2d 995 (9th Cir. 1981) Cited 13 times
In NLRB v. Mar-Len Cabinets, Inc., 659 F.2d 995 (9th Cir. 1981), we held that looking to the substance of an agreement is permissible when it "supports an inference of intent to frustrate agreement where... the entire spectrum of proposals put forward by a party is so consistently and predictably unpalatable to the other party that the proposer should know agreement is impossible."
Iatse v. N.L.R.B
779 F.2d 552 (9th Cir. 1985) Cited 7 times
No. 85-7140. Argued and Submitted November 6, 1985. Decided December 30, 1985. Michael B. Roger, Paul Supton, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger Rosenfeld, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners. John Elligers, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Philip L. Ross, Severson, Werson, Berke, Melchior, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor. On Petition for Review of Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before HUG and HALL, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge. The Honorable William J. Jameson