§
Myrtle Desk Co.

2 Cited authorities

  1. Inland Empire Council v. Millis

    325 U.S. 697 (1945)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Inland Empire, a union that had lost a representation election brought suit in district court challenging the Board's proceedings on the ground that there had not been the "appropriate hearing" mandated by Section 9(c) of the NLRA. It argued that the failure to provide such a hearing violated the union's statutory and due process rights.

  2. Labor Board v. Int. Brotherhood

    308 U.S. 413 (1940)   Cited 50 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 253. Argued December 8, 1939. Decided January 2, 1940. A direction for an election made by the National Labor Relations Board in a representation proceeding under § 9(c) of the National Labor Relations Act is not reviewable by a Circuit Court of Appeals under § 10 of the Act. American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board, ante, p. 401. P. 414. 105 F.2d 598, reversed. CERTIORARI, post, p. 537, to review a judgment